Loading ...
I wondered about this whole story regarding the Lancet retracting the Vaccine study from day one. It seems that my initial assumptions on the matter may be more accurate then I had anticipated. To put it simply, Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in 1998 that showed a link between vaccines and Autism. It has remained in the journals in the Lancet ever since then until just most recently. The Lancet has just decided to retract the study from its journal, claiming that Wakefield did not use good practices during his trials. They are now making a huge media storm over it, making everyone believe that he is the bad guy.
To keep it short about Generation Rescue, it was started by Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey when their son was diagnosed with Autism. They did their own research and found out the truth on the matter, that when you look at the facts surrounding Autism you see that vaccines are most likely to blame. They have been trying to get this information out to the public ever since, but it has been hard for them. Now they are trying to get the correct information out about this Wakefield story, and I applaud them. They have had my support in the past and now I am even more satisfied with their work. It is absolutely imperative that this quackery be exposed if this is truly happening. This may be the straw that breaks the camels back.
I am not going to get into the details and I know ignorance will claim most “Pro Vacciners” because of your “belief” but the important thing at this time is following this story and trying to get to the truth regarding Wakefield. Read the following, hold back the complaining and accusations and do your own research.
Sourced straight from Generation Rescue:
Dr. Andrew Wakefield is being discredited to prevent an historic study from being published that for the first time looks at vaccinated versus unvaccinated primates and compares health outcomes, with potentially devastating consequences for vaccine makers and public health officials.
It is our most sincere belief that Dr. Wakefield and parents of children with autism around the world are being subjected to a remarkable media campaign engineered by vaccine manufacturers reporting on the retraction of a paper published in The Lancet in 1998 by Dr. Wakefield and his colleagues.
The retraction from The Lancet was a response to a ruling from England’s General Medical Council, a kangaroo court where public health officials in the pocket of vaccine makers served as judge and jury. Dr. Wakefield strenuously denies all the findings of the GMC and plans a vigorous appeal.
Despite rampant misreporting, Dr. Wakefield’s original paper regarding 12 children with severe bowel disease and autism never rendered any judgment whatsoever on whether or not vaccines cause autism, and The Lancet’s retraction gets us no closer to understanding this complex issue.
Dr. Wakefield is one of the world’s most respected and well-published gastroenterologists. He has published dozens of papers since 1998 in well-regarded peer-reviewed journals all over the world. His work documenting the bowel disease of children with autism and his exploration of novel ways to treat bowel disease has helped relieve the pain and suffering of thousands of children with autism.
For the past decade, parents in our community have been clamoring for a relatively simple scientific study that could settle the debate over the possible role of vaccines in the autism epidemic once and for all: compare children who have been vaccinated with children who have never received any vaccines and see if the rate of autism is different or the same.
Few people are aware that this extremely important work has not only begun, but that a study using an animal model has already been completed exploring this topic in great detail.
Dr. Wakefield is the co-author, along with eight other distinguished scientists from institutions like the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Kentucky, and the University of Washington, of a set of studies that explore the topic of vaccinated versus unvaccinated neurological outcomes using monkeys.
The first phase of this monkey study was published three months ago in the prestigious medical journal Neurotoxicology, and focused on the first two weeks of life when the vaccinated monkeys received a single vaccine for Hepatitis B, mimicking the U.S. vaccine schedule. The results, which you can read for yourself here, were disturbing. Vaccinated monkeys, unlike their unvaccinated peers, suffered the loss of many reflexes that are critical for survival.
Dr. Wakefield and his scientific colleagues are on the brink of publishing their entire study, which followed the monkeys through the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule over a multi-year period. It is our understanding that the difference in outcome for the vaccinated monkeys versus the unvaccinated controls is both stark and devastating.
There is no question that the publication of the monkey study will lend substantial credibility to the theory that over-vaccination of young children is leading to neurological damage, including autism. The fallout from the study for vaccine makers and public health officials could be severe. Having denied the possibility of the vaccine-autism connection for so long while profiting immensely from a recent boom in vaccine sales around the world, it’s no surprise that they would seek to repress this important work.
Behind the scenes, the pressure to keep the work of Dr. Wakefield and his colleagues from being published is immense, and growing every day. Medical journals take extreme risk of backlash in publishing any studies that question the safety of the vaccination program, no matter how well-designed and thorough the research might be. Neurotoxicology, a highly-respected medical journal, deserves great credit for courageously publishing the first phase of this vaccinated monkey study.
The press has been deeply misled in the way The Lancet retraction, and Dr. Wakefield’s mock trial, have been characterized. Led by the pharmaceutical companies and their well-compensated spokespeople, Dr. Wakefield is being vilified through a well-orchestrated smear campaign designed to prevent this important new work from seeing the light of day.
What medical journal would want to step in front of this freight train? Moreover, why now, after 12 years of inaction, did The Lancet and GMC suddenly act? Is it coincidence that the monkey study is currently being submitted to medical journals for review and publication?
We urge the media to take a close look at the first phase of the monkey study discussed above and to start asking a very simple question: What was the final outcome of the 14 primates that were vaccinated using the U.S. vaccine schedule and how did that compare to the unvaccinated controls?
The U.S. vaccine schedule has grown from 10 vaccines given to our children in the 1980s to 36 today, perfectly matching the dramatic rise in autism. The work of Dr. Wakefield and his colleagues deserves to be shared with the world to further, rather than censor, scientific progress.
So Wakefield is about to do it again!? Is he about to show us once again that vaccines are substantially contributing to Autism and the like? I wonder what the outcome will be? I am going to guess that absolutely 0 of the non-vaccinated monkeys got autism or the like, and at least a few vaccinated monkeys came down with complications. From the sounds of it, more than a few vaccinated monkeys had problems. It should show exactly the same thing we are seeing with our children of today. IT ABSOLUTELY NEEDS TO BE PUBLISHED AND KNOWN ABOUT.
I just asked someone the other day in fact “Why don’ we start doing studies on children that are non-vaccinated and children that are vaccinated?” Why don’t we look at more studies like this? Why don’t we look at populations like the Amish where Autism rates are next to nothing while their vaccine rates are also next to nothing when compared to general America and other countries? I think the truth would start to show VERY quickly if someone did this, and it is probably out of fear that most haven’t.
I had a gut feeling that something like this was the case regarding Wakefield, and that they falsified some data somewhere along the line specifically to make Wakefield look bad for some reason and to get that journal retracted. I did not know why it was happening other than to get rid of the study, but it seems there is a more desperate act going on. Now I see that Wakefield is about to publish another study.
Apparently the vaccine industry does not care about your health. They care above all about money and protecting their business. Silencing the truth seems to be number one for them, regardless of what they have to do. It seems that this is just another plot to silence the information that exposes their crooked industry and their methods. This is not me ranting about vaccines. This is the truth and the truth is going to be unfolding in front of our very eyes if this gets out whether you like it or you don’t. Open them up and take a good long look at what might be going on. Personally I cannot wait for the day, god I cannot wait….
Too many people are becoming crippled in the name of greed.